Lielbritānijas izstāšanās no ES: turpmākie soļi

Jācer,ka UK izstāšanās būs sākums eiropedolāču savienības sabrukumam.

Angliju par drosmi neklausities liekuligajos un meligajos politikos, kas baidija, jo tikai vini zaudes ar so brexit, ne Anglija, kura ir speciga un bagata, Brexit ir tikai un vienigi reakcija pret Eiropas politkiem, kokreti Merkeli un Vaciju, kas komandee visu Eiropu, it kaa taa vinai vienai piederetu. Tapat pret Briseles liekeziem, kuri ir tik glevi un miksti, ka nespej neko, pat aizsargat Eiropu vini nav spejigi,. Pedejo 2 gadu politiku darbiba bijusi katastrofala un Eiropu iznicinosa, tapec paldies UK, kas iesplava visiem siem mesliem sejaa! Lai Latvijas politiki ari padomaa!

Вот и хорошо. Пусть латыши пашут на своей земле а не бегут на всё готовое.

Kas nu tur par soļiem. Lai nu paliek tā Eiropas Savienība. Bet šī gēniski vampīriskā, gadsimtiem teju vai visu zemeslodi intensīvi izsūkusī, eksimpērija ir gluži vienkārši pilnīgi jāizolē. Kamēr tās cilvēces mieru un drošību apdraudošie establišmenti netiks demontēti, un norakti uz necelšanos. Vēl aktuālāk tas ir attiecībā uz Britu Impērijas miesīgās atvases - Vašingtotā Totālās Impērijas institūtiem.. Nedrīkst atkārtoties Balkānu, Irākas, Tuvo Austrumu noziegumi. Cilvēcei ir vajadzīgs miers, drošība, taisnība, likumība. Nevis meli, naidošanas, globāls terors un teroristi, un globāla laupīšana un laupītāji.

ron triangle (US politics) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Iron Triangle diagram In United States politics, the iron triangle comprises the policy-making relationship among the congressional committees, the bureaucracy, and interest groups.[1] Contents 1 Central assumption 2 Cultivation of a constituency 3 Dynamics of an iron triangle 4 See also 5 References 6 Bibliography Central assumption Central to the concept of an iron triangle is the assumption that bureaucratic agencies, as political entities, seek to create and consolidate their own power base. In this view an agency's power is determined by its constituency, not by its consumers. (For these purposes, "constituents" are politically active members sharing a common interest or goal; consumers are the expected recipients of goods or services provided by a governmental bureaucracy and are often identified in an agency's written goals or mission statement.) Apparent bureaucratic dysfunction may be attributable to the alliances formed between the agency and its constituency. The official goals of an agency may appear to be thwarted or ignored altogether at the expense of the citizenry it is designed to serve. Cultivation of a constituency The need of a bureaucracy for a constituency sometimes leads to an agency's cultivation of a particular clientele. An agency may seek out those groups (within its policy jurisdiction) that will make the best allies and give it the most clout within the political arena. Often, especially in a low-level bureaucracy, the consumers (the supposed beneficiaries of an agency's services) do not qualify as power brokers and thus make poor constituents. Large segments of the public have diffused interests, seldom vote, may be rarely or poorly organized and difficult to mobilize, and are often lacking in resources or financial muscle. Less-educated and poorer citizens, for example, typically make the worst constituents from an agency's perspective. Private or special interest groups, on the other hand, possess considerable power as they tend to be well-organized, have plenty of resources, are easily mobilized, and are extremely active in political affairs, through voting, campaign contributions, and lobbying, as well as proposing legislation themselves. Thus it may be in an agency's interest to switch its focus from its officially-designated consumers to a carefully selected clientele of constituents that will aid the agency in its quest for greater political influence. Dynamics of an iron triangle In the United States, power is exercised in the Congress, and particularly in congressional committees and subcommittees. By aligning itself with selected constituencies, an agency may be able to affect policy outcomes directly in these committees and subcommittees. This is where an iron triangle may manifest itself. The picture above displays the concept. At one corner of the triangle are interest groups (constituencies). These are the powerful interest's groups that influence Congressional votes in their favor and can sufficiently influence the re-election of a member of Congress in return for supporting their programs. At another corner sit members of Congress who also seek to align themselves with a constituency for political and electoral support. These congressional members support legislation that advances the interest group's agenda. Occupying the third corner of the triangle are bureaucrats, who are often pressured by the same powerful interest groups their agency is designated to regulate. The result is a three-way, stable alliance that is sometimes called a sub-government because of its durability, impregnability, and power to determine policy. An iron triangle can result in the passing of very narrow, pork-barrel policies that benefit a small segment of the population. The interests of the agency's constituency (the interest groups) are met, while the needs of consumers (which may be the general public) are passed over. That public administration may result in benefiting a small segment of the public in this way may be viewed as problematic for the popular concept of democracy if the general welfare of all citizens is sacrificed for very specific interests. This is especially so if the legislation passed neglects or reverses the original purpose for which the agency was established. Some maintain that such arrangements are consonant with (and are natural outgrowths of) the democratic process, since they frequently involve a majority block of voters implementing their will through their representatives in government.

Mazās tautas nekad nevar būt brīvas un nebūs. Briti var mēģināt, bet ne ko vairāk.